Colorado extends tuition fees to Native American tribesmen

Indigenous out-of-state students whose tribes have historic ties to Colorado will receive in-state tuition starting in the fall.

SB21-209, which Gov. Jared Polis promulgated on Monday, recognizes Native American tribes were forced out of Colorado and demands higher education institutions provide in-state tuition fees for students who are members of the 48 known native tribes that were in Colorado. Colorado still has only two federally recognized tribes in the state, the Southern Ute Tribe and the Ute Mountain Tribe.

Democratic leaders from both houses of the legislature sponsored the bill and it received bipartisan support.

Fort Lewis College offers free classes to members of a Native American tribe recognized by the Federal Government of the United States or an Native Alaskan village, and Colorado State University offers Native American students classes in the state. . After the University of Colorado Boulder also decided to make the change last year, lawmakers did what they couldn’t do in the past: implement the tuition hiatus across all schools. Colorado public colleges and universities.

“It’s long overdue, and the fact that all the other higher education institutions have signed up, I think it’s a testament to the fact that it’s good for Colorado; it’s good for higher education, ”said Speaker of the House Alec Garnett, a Democrat from Denver and sponsor of the bill.

He added that it would help schools rebuild relationships with tribes that have collapsed over the years, and help colleges and universities diversify their student populations.

In another move to support indigenous communities, Polis also promulgated SB21-116 on Monday. Beginning in June 2022, any public school that has a Native American mascot without formal tribal approval will be subject to a monthly fine of $ 25,000.

Source link

Alaska Native Tribes Receive $ 500 Million Funding From CARES Through SOCTUS Decision

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday in favor of granting $ 500 million to Native American Indian tribes in Alaska under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, instead of distributing benefits more widely among Native American tribes, the Associated Press reported.

The judges decided 6-3 to send the relief package to the natives of Alaska after a debate over whether they counted as “Indian tribes” because they were for-profit companies that provide benefits and social services to more than 100,000 Alaskan natives.

After the CARES Act was passed, three Native American groups filed a lawsuit to prevent Native Alaskan corporations from receiving the money. They argued that aid belongs to the tribes which are sovereign governments and not to corporations.

For more Associated Press reporting, see below.

WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 23: Associate Judge Sonia Sotomayor sits during a Supreme Court justices group photo in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021.
Erin Schaff-Pool / Getty Images

The broad pandemic contingency plan was adopted last year and promulgated by then-President Donald Trump. The $ 2.2 trillion legislation earmarked $ 8 billion for “tribal governments” to cover expenses related to the pandemic.

“The Court now affirms what the federal government has maintained for almost half a century: the NCAs are Indian tribes,” Judge Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of a group of members both liberal and conservative. from the courtyard.

Sotomayor and dissenting Judge Neil Gorsuch argued over the wording of the CARES Act, with Sotomayor at one point comparing it to a poorly constructed restaurant advertisement.

If the restaurant offers “50% off any meat, vegetable or seafood dish, including ceviche, which is cooked,” the best ad reading, she said, is that ” cooked ”does not apply to ceviche, a raw fish dish, but this ceviche is still 50% off. A different reading would make the ceviche a “red herring,” she continued.

Gorsuch, who in an argument once revealed his preference for turmeric in his steak, called the example “a bit lacking”. He then cited two different newspaper articles on the ceviche. He was joined in his dissent by Justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan.

The case is significant not only because of the amount of money it involves, but also because Native Americans and Alaska Natives have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. The Trump and Biden administrations both agreed that businesses should be treated like Indian tribes and that doing it differently would be a radical departure from the status quo.

In a statement after the ruling, Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez said the coalition of tribes that brought the lawsuit were disappointed.

“This case was never about funds. Instead, it was about maintaining tribal sovereignty and the status of federally recognized tribes,” he said, adding that the decision ” undermines federally recognized tribes and will have consequences far beyond the CARES Act allocation dollar. “

Part of the question for the Supreme Court was that Alaska is unique. Unlike the lower 48 states, Alaska’s native tribes are not located on reservations. Instead, native lands are owned by Alaska Native corporations established under a 1971 statute. For-profit corporations run oil, gas, mining, and other businesses. Alaskan natives own shares in companies, which provide a range of services from health and elderly care to educational support and housing assistance.

Associations representing indigenous societies applauded the decision.

“We are delighted to see the Court affirm the eligibility of Alaska Native societies for CARES Act funds to help our people and communities recover from the devastating effects of COVID-19. Alaska’s economy is only starting to recover, and these funds are needed to help our communities get back on their feet, ”the associations said.

short Supreme
FILE – This file photo from June 8, 2021 shows the Supreme Court in Washington.
J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press
Source link

No Credit Check Loan | Ascension

Then, submit a request. You will likely need to verify your identity, address, and possibly your employment. If you plan to use collateral to secure a loan (such as a car), you will need to take a few additional steps. See our guide to getting a secured loan for more information on this process.

To finish, make a plan to repay the loan. It can be difficult. If you’re having trouble, talk to a trusted community leader, friend or family member. Some banks offer free financial advice to their customers.

Don’t feel embarrassed to ask for help if you need it. Almost everyone has needed help juggling their finances, making things work when money is tight, and paying off debt. You’re not alone.

What’s the easiest loan to get with bad credit?

If you have bad credit, don’t look for a no credit check to lend. Rather, look for bad credit ready. These loans are cheaper than loans without credit check, and you can qualify for a loan with a low credit score. In fact, you can even qualify for some bad loans if you have no credit!

Where can you find these lenders? Start with our list of the best bad credit loans. There you will find reputable lenders who charge lower interest rates than many competitors.

If your credit is too low to qualify for a bad credit loan, you can choose from different loan options. All of the following are more expensive than bad loans, but they don’t require a credit check:

The army corps asks the judge to throw out the environments, the indigenous tribes file a complaint on line 3

An activist opposing the Enbridge Line 3 pipeline hangs from a structure in St. Paul, Minnesota, United States, June 28, 2018. REUTERS / Rod Nickel

  • Army Corps says line review took greenhouse gas emissions into account
  • Plaintiffs ‘disappointed’ with Biden administrator backing pipeline project

(Reuters) – The Biden administration has asked a Washington DC federal court to file a lawsuit against Indigenous tribes and environmental groups seeking to stop construction of the Line 3 pipeline replacement project of Enbridge Inc in northern Minnesota.

In a case filed Wednesday, the Army Corps of Engineers asked U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly to dismiss the lawsuit brought by the Red Lake Chippewa Indian Band, the Sierra Club and others, arguing that it had authorized the disputed project after a five-year review. process that meets all review requirements, including analysis of greenhouse gas emissions.

Moneen Nasmith of Earthjustice, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said: “We are extremely disappointed that the Biden administration is continuing the Trump administration’s policy of ignoring tribal rights, environmental justice and climate concerns in favor of profits. of the fossil fuel industry “.

Spokesman Gene Pawlik said the body is not commenting on the pending litigation.

Enbridge spokesperson Michael Barnes said: “The brief filed for the US Army Corps of Engineers … sets out the very in-depth review of scientific approvals of federal permits and approvals for the proposed replacement of the line 3 ”.

The coalition of indigenous tribes and green groups lodged a complaint in December. He said the Corps’ conclusions that the project poses no significant risk are too narrow because they do not sufficiently take into account the indirect impacts of the pipeline on climate change.

The plaintiffs have asked the court to overturn November building permits, including a Section 404 Clean Water Act permit to dump dredged material into federal waters.

In Wednesday’s counterclaim for summary judgment, the Corps denied claims it acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner when it discovered that greenhouse gas emissions from “permitted activities would be negligible to minor.” .

He further argued that although the plaintiffs claim that the construction will indirectly increase oil production levels in Canada, where the line begins, “the authority of the Corps is limited to the United States.”

The replacement of the pipeline, which entered service in 1968, will allow Enbridge to approximately double its capacity to 760,000 barrels per day.

Earlier this month, protesters halted construction of Line 3 just days before Calgary-based Enbridge claimed victory in the Minnesota Court of Appeals on June 14, which upheld the ruling a state regulatory agency that line replacement is sufficiently necessary.

Construction of the 330-mile Minnesota section of Line 3, which connects Alberta to Wisconsin, began in December and is expected to be completed in the last quarter of this year, according to Enbridge.

The case is Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers, US District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1: 20-cv-03817.

For Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians et al: Moneen Nasmith of Earthjustice

For the US Army Corps of Engineers: Heather Gange with the US Department of Justice

For the intervener defendant Enbridge Energy Limited: Deidre Duncan de Hunton Andrews Kurth

Read more:

Enbridge oil line secures key victory as Minnesota court confirms approval

Protesters clash with police at the Enbridge pipeline construction site in Minnesota

Despite the second rebuff, in federal court, enviros say starting only pleading line 3

Sebastien malo

Sébastien Malo reporters on environmental, climate and energy litigation. Contact him at [email protected]

Source link

Colorado River Indian Tribes Introduce Region’s First Vehicle Charging Stations – The Bee – The Buzz in Bullhead City – Lake Havasu City – Kingman – Arizona – California

Colorado River Indian Tribes Introduce Region’s First

Vehicle charging stations

The project reflects the commitment to the environment and sustainability

PARKER, AZ As part of an ongoing commitment to preserving the environment, creating sustainability, and providing valuable amenities to customers, the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT) introduced the first charging stations for electric vehicles (EVs) in the area at the BlueWater Resort and Casino. Two dual-port electric vehicle charging stations, installed by Motive Energy Telecommunication of Corona, Calif., Are located in the parking lot on the west side of the complex.

With the installation of the recent EV charging station project, CRIT has the capacity to install additional stations in the future. The expansion of the EV infrastructure will allow accommodation of additional guests and facilitate the addition of electric vehicles to the Tribal fleet. The electric vehicle charging station initiative was funded by the Volkswagen (VW) Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust (VW Indian Tribe Trust). Efforts have been made by the Environmental Protection Office (EPO) of CRIT to become a beneficiary of the VW Indian Tribe Trust in order to secure funding.

The funds allocated to CRIT are subject to strict guidelines for the reduction of emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) on the Reserve which consists of replacing old polluting diesel vehicles with new diesel vehicles with low emissions. New 2021 low-emission Thomas diesel school bus and 2021 low-emission school bus
Ford F-600 dump trucks were purchased to replace similar older models, resulting in significant reductions in NOx emissions on the reservation each year.

About the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT)
The Colorado River Indian tribes include four distinct tribes: the Mohave, Chemehuevi, Hopi, and Navajo. There are currently around 3,500 active tribal members. The CRIT reserve was created in 1865 by the federal government for the “Indians of the Colorado River and its tributaries”, originally for the Mohaves and Chemehuevi, who had inhabited the area for centuries. People from the Hopi and Navajo tribes have moved to the reserve in recent years. The reserve stretches along the Colorado River on the Arizona and California sides. It comprises nearly 300,000 acres of land, with the river serving as the focal point and cornerstone of the region. The primary community on the CRIT Reservation is Parker, Arizona, which is located on a combination of tribal land, land leased from CRIT, and land owned by non-Native Americans. There are other smaller communities on the reserve, including Poston, located 10 miles south of Parker.

This was brought to you by

Source link

The legacy of Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa, brothers who united indigenous tribes against American expansion

At the start of the 19th century, two Shawnee brothers rose to prominence in the Great Lakes region. The younger brother, Tenskwatawa, was a spiritual leader known as “The Prophet”. His older brother was Tecumseh, a renowned statesman and military commander who organized a pan-Indian confederacy of several thousand people, many from Michigan. A new biography published in October 2020 details the brothers’ experiences and their interwoven visions of an alliance of indigenous tribes, unified in spirituality and resistance to white settlers who were encroaching on their lands and lives.

Pierre Cozzens is a historian and author of the new book Tecumseh and the Prophet: The Shawnee Brothers Who Defied a Nation. He said that after the War of Independence, the United States expanded its colonies westward, causing significant and often violent disruption to tribal life, especially for Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa. As children, they did not have the chance to have a stable and normal childhood, he noted. Several members of their family, including their father, were killed when they were very young.

“They were constantly uprooted by raids launched by the Kentucky militia or other American forces in the area. So they were constantly pushed deeper into Ohio and saw their lands shrink and their tribe split, ”Cozzens said.

Cozzens said it is likely that constantly having to deal with the threat of invaders from an early age shaped both Tenskwatawa’s spiritual doctrine and Tecumseh’s approach to leadership.

“Tenskwatawa [called for] spiritual and cultural rebirth on the part of the tribes of the Great Lakes region as a kind of precursor of a revitalization of their cultures and way of life, which was shattered by the American presence and the influence of alcohol and of American encroachment, ”he mentioned. “Tecumseh [called] for political unity among the tribes, for the tribes to stop negotiating piecemeal semi-legitimate treaties with the U.S. government, and instead unite and consider any remaining land they owned in the Midwest as being theirs in common.

Cozzens notes in his biography the importance of the brothers’ relationship, as well as how they shaped and supported each other’s ideas.

“Tecumseh readily accepted Tenskwatawa’s doctrine and vision. And when Tecumseh developed this to include his call for unity against American encroachment, Tenskwatawa also supported that and incorporated it into his spiritual and cultural doctrine, ”he said. “They seemed to work very well together, hand in hand.”

[Get Stateside on your phone: subscribe on Apple Podcasts or Google Podcasts today.]

While some indigenous individuals and communities in the region agreed with Tenskwatawa’s messages, others did not, said Eric Hemenway, Director of Archives and Records of the Odawa Indian Bands of Little Traverse Bay and Member of the Michigan Historical Commission.

“[Tenskwatawa] had quite a bit of hold. But then the Prophet was also very, very strict, for lack of term, in his messages and delivery, ”Hemenway said. “He has taken a very hard line in some cases with other tribes. He was interfering, and some other tribes didn’t like how it was. They thought he exceeded his limits. So it was all based on the individual and the community and how they viewed that person. “

Relations between tribes in the Great Lakes regions were always on the move, Hemenway said. Thus, Tecumseh’s ability to unite the tribes and their warriors into a single alliance was a testament to his skill as a leader.

“Every warrior is independent,” he said. “They weren’t under this allegiance to Tecumseh or even to their own warlords. They left of their own accord and could leave the battlefield at any time. So when you had thousands of these warriors together in the field, it was truly remarkable leadership. “

Hemenway said indigenous peoples faced unfathomable hardships during Tecumseh’s time of life, including disease, displacement, open hostilities and attacks from militias and settlers. He said it was part of what led the tribes to consider joining an alliance like the one proposed by Tecumseh.

“You have to have land and land where you can feed your families and carry out your culture and ceremonies. So if that means you live in shared territories, so be it, because what’s the alternative? Destruction, “he said.” Violence was not the first answer, but sometimes you had to go to war. And that’s what I think was going on in those days, that they just had to , in quotes, take the hatchet to protect what they had for thousands of years.

At the start of the War of 1812, Tecumseh and his alliance joined forces with the British on the battlefield to fight the Americans. Cozzens said Tecumseh envisioned and fought for a permanent homeland for indigenous peoples that was non-negotiable. This sovereign nation would have included the lands that make up Michigan.

“The government of the United States would have no influence, no control over this land,” Cozzens said. “It would be a land that would be inviolable and would be the domain of the Native Americans forever.”

Hemenway said he viewed the War of 1812 as part of a continuation of Indigenous resistance to encroachment by white settlers, as in the Pontiac War and the War of the Little Turtle, which took place during of previous decades.

“So Tecumseh has this history, this lineage within the Great Lakes, of resistance,” Hemenway said. “He watches what Little Turtle has done, he watches what Pontiac has done, and he carries the torch.

But the sovereign nation envisioned by Tecumseh never saw the light of day. Tecumseh was killed at the Battle of the Thames in 1813 and the tribal alliance dissolved after his death. Tenskwatawa died a few decades later, in 1836.

Hemenway noted that Tecumseh was both a persuasive speaker and a distinguished leader on the battlefield. He said that while many people may be familiar with Tecumseh’s name, they may not know much about his heritage, which has permanently shaped the region, nation and continent.

“He’s a hero. I mean, I can’t think of another word. I could say chief, I could say chief, but in my mind, as an Anishinaabe, that doesn’t do him justice, ”Hemenway said. “We talk all the time about the Founding Fathers – Jefferson, Washington, Franklin. Tribes have their own heroes and people who have gone above and beyond to defend their interests and fight for their freedom and rights, and Tecumseh is a prime example. So maybe as we recognize Tecumseh, we’ll begin to recognize other Indigenous heroes – from the state of Michigan, to begin with as well. We had people from here in Emmet County – Assiginack, Makadepenasi, Apawkausegun – men who were eminent leaders who helped shape the world we live in today.

This article was written by Nell Ovitt, Production Assistant in the United States.

Source link

Court unanimously rules that Indian tribes retain inherent power to police non-Indians

SCOTUS news

In its first major opinion on the extent of sovereign powers of Native American tribes in decades, the Supreme Court held Tuesday to United States v. Cooley that tribal governments – and therefore their police officers – have the power to search and temporarily detain non-Indians suspected of breaking federal or state laws on reserves. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the notice for the court. Judge Samuel Alito has filed a brief agreement stating that he considers the detention to be limited.

The accused in this case, Joshua James Cooley, was arrested after a tribal police officer noticed him on the edge of a federal highway that crosses the Crow Indian Reservation in Montana. The officer found evidence that led to a federal drug and firearms prosecution. Cooley argued that the evidence was obtained illegally because the tribal officer did not have the authority to detain and search him. Defense suggested the officer should have assessed Cooley’s Indian status and then let him go realizing he was not an Indian unless the officer actively saw him commit a crime – a framework that the prosecuting jurisdiction, the United States, argued was impractical and dangerous for officers and tribal communities.

The court has made it clear over the years that tribal governments no longer have certain powers, especially those that involve the rights of non-Indians. In Cooley, the court was asked to determine where tribal policing powers fell within the various frameworks it developed to determine whether tribal sovereignty still extends to certain powers. Cooley also forced the court to face some of the more complicated realities created by its precedent, such as whether it is necessary or even possible to assess a suspect’s Indian status during a routine traffic stop .

Breyer’s opinion considers, and probably extends, the scope of the court’s decision in Montana v. United States. In Montana, the court established the general rule that tribes no longer retain inherent governmental powers over the conduct of non-Indians, but identified two exceptions to this rule. Breyer explained that the second exception “fits the present case, almost like a glove”. This second exception recognizes that tribes must also retain power over the conduct of non-Indians if such conduct “threatens or has a direct effect on the political integrity, economic security, or health or welfare of the tribe. “. The power to temporarily detain and search non-Indians on tribal roads is precisely the kind of authority over non-Indians that tribes must retain in order to protect themselves from a threat to their health and well-being. Without the power to stop and search non-Indians on tribal highways, Breyer wrote, it would be “difficult for tribes to protect themselves from ongoing threats” such as “non-Indian drunk drivers, contraband carriers. or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reserve.

Check back soon for an in-depth opinion analysis.

Source link

This plant used by North American Indian tribes to make war paint could kill deadly breast tumors

TALLAHASSEE, Florida – A plant used by Indian tribes in North America to make war paint could kill deadly breast tumors, new research shows. Bloodroot was worn by the Sioux, Comanches, and Apaches to terrify the enemy in battle. It contains a compound toxic to triple negative breast cancer, one of the most difficult types to treat, according to scientists.

Bloodroot, endemic to the United States, is endangered in some areas. It produces beautiful white and yellow flowers. Experiments show that the chemical found in the plant, called ‘sanguinarine’, stops the disease in its tracks. In addition, it was particularly effective in black women, who are the most prone.

“Our results suggest that sanguinarine may have therapeutic potential for patients, particularly African American women with the disease,” said lead author Dr Samia Messeha, pharmacist at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, in a press release.

How the blood root has become a “promising tool” to protect against breast cancer

The red sap bleeding by the blood root, also known as Sanguinaria canadensis, was used to decorate baskets and clothes, as well as for the face and body. War paint was believed to provide American Indians with supernatural powers when fighting invaders, including American cavalry. Like its cousin the poppy, wild grass is poisonous and a source of opium.

Sanguarine could be a “promising tool” in the fight against breast cancer, according to the team. Cells derived from women of African American descent were more sensitive than those of European descent.

“Triple negative breast cancer is particularly aggressive in African American women, who are also more likely to develop this type of breast cancer than women of European descent,” says Messeha. “There is a strong interest in the search for new therapeutic strategies to fight against this cancer. “

It is not fueled by hormones or protein, so it does not respond to hormone therapy. Up to 20 percent of breast cancers are triple negative.

Previous studies have suggested that sanguinarine, also found in poppies and other herbal remedies, has anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects. In this latest research, Messeha and her colleagues used it to treat two groups of triple negative cells, one from women of African American descent and the other from Europeans.

The chemical reduced the viability and growth of both, with the best results in those taken from the former. It also turned on different genes in each group, which could help explain why some patients do not respond to certain medications.

Could sanguinarine help improve the effects of other cancer drugs?

The researchers presented the results at a virtual meeting of the American Society for Investigative Pathology.

They now plan to study the effects of sanguinarine in triple negative breast cancer cell lines. They will also analyze its effects in combination with common drugs for this form of breast cancer.

Hollywood star Angelina Jolie had her breasts, ovaries and fallopian tubes removed after finding out she had an inherited BRCA1 mutation. About 70 percent of breast cancers diagnosed in people with the variant are triple negative.

They are considered more aggressive and have a poorer prognosis than other types of breast cancer, and tend to be of higher grade. It is more likely to be diagnosed in people under the age of 50 and blacks and Hispanics than Asians and whites. Finding out if you’ve inherited the gene requires a test using a blood sample.

SWNS writer Mark Waghorn contributed to this report.

Source link

OpenSky Secure Visa Card Review

We want to help you make better informed decisions. Certain links on this page – clearly marked – may direct you to a partner website and earn us a referral commission. For more information, see How we make money. This page contains information about Discover products that are not currently available on NextAdvisor and may be out of date.

  • Introductory bonus: No current offer
  • Annual subscription : $ 35
  • Regular APR: 17.39% (variable)
  • Recommended credit score: (No credit history)

OpenSky does not require a credit check when you apply for the OpenSky® Secured Visa® credit card, which means you can get approved and start rebuilding your credit, regardless of your current credit score or history. In exchange, you’ll pay an annual fee of $ 35 and need to secure your line of credit with a cash deposit.

In one look

  • No credit check required
  • Reports to the three credit bureaus
  • Refundable security deposit (minimum $ 200, up to $ 3,000) required
  • $ 35 annual fee
  • 17.39% variable APR

Benefits

  • Get approved without a credit check

  • Generate credit by making full payments on time, with monthly reports to credit bureaus

  • The security deposit is fully refundable

The inconvenients

  • Minimum deposit of $ 200 required

  • $ 35 annual fee

  • No reward on your spending

Additional card details

This card is above all a credit building tool. It does not offer any rewards or benefits beyond access to credit for people with bad or no credit history.

The main benefit of OpenSky Secured Visa is the ability to get approved and start building credit without a credit check, which can be a major barrier to accessing credit for people with less than credit. stellar – even among other bad or secure credit cards. credit card.

OpenSky offers a few additional tools to help you on your credit building journey, including a mobile app where you can track your payments and credit card bill, and a dedicated Facebook group with other OpenSky cardholders. you can reach for help while you are working. towards your financial goals.

Should you get this card?

Since the OpenSky Secured Visa credit card does not require applicants to undergo a credit check, it is a solid option to consider if you have a very low credit rating, have recently filed for bankruptcy, or are you do not have a checking account (in this case you can request and submit your security deposit by money order or Western Union).

Many issuers may deny your application if you have filed for bankruptcy or encountered other financial problems, even if you are willing to deposit money as collateral in a secure card account.

While a credit check is not required for approval, that does not mean approval is guaranteed. In addition to submitting a deposit, here are some criteria you must meet to Eligibility for OpenSky:

  • You must be a U.S. citizen at least 18 years of age with a valid Social Security number or Individual Tax Identification Number (TIN).
  • You should have more monthly income than your monthly expenses.
  • You cannot have applied for a Capital Bank credit card four or more times in the past 60 days or have at least two credit card accounts open with Capital Bank, and any current or previous accounts with Capital Bank must be in good standing. (Capital Bank is the bank that owns OpenSky)

A big downside to this card is its annual fee. Not only will you be required to submit at least $ 200 as a refundable security deposit, but you will be paying $ 35 each year you own the card. Other secure cards, such as the Discover it® Secured Credit Card or Capital One Secured Mastercard® Credit Card, charge no annual fees and the same minimum (or lower) deposit.

Pro tip

The cash deposit required to open your OpenSky Secure Visa credit card will be used as security for your account and will be your credit limit, but is fully refundable if you close your account in good standing with a balance of $ 0.

Before applying, consider other cards you may qualify for that offer more benefits or credit building tools than this card. For example, some secure card issuers will automatically review your account after a certain period of time to determine if you are eligible to upgrade to an unsecured card or increase your credit limit.

How to use the OpenSky secure Visa credit card

Since the OpenSky Secured Visa credit card is primarily used to create credit, you should make sure that you use it responsibly and wisely.

Charge only what you can afford to pay, and pay your credit card bill earlier or on time each month to ensure that the information reported to all three credit bureaus has a positive impact on your score. If you don’t pay in full and on time, not only will it negatively affect your credit score, but you will end up paying a lot more over time thanks to this card’s high variable APR.

With a low credit limit, you’ll also need to be careful about your reported credit usage or how much balance you owe against your credit limit. This is the second factor with the most impact on your credit score after payment history. Experts recommend keeping your usage rate at least below 30% for the best credit score results.

If you deposit $ 200 when opening the account, that means you will need to keep your balance below $ 60 each month to maintain a healthy ratio. OpenSky allows you to deposit up to $ 3,000, so you can increase your limit if you have the money to fund it.

While it may take some time, the goal of using a card like the OpenSky Secure Visa Credit Card should be to build your credit score enough that you can switch to an unsecured credit card. Since the issuer does not offer automatic account reviews to determine if you are eligible to upgrade to an unsecured card option, you will need to monitor your credit progress yourself. And when you’re ready to upgrade, you can get your deposit back by closing the account in good standing, with your balance paid in full.

Secure OpenSky Visa credit card compared to other cards

  • Introductory bonus:

    No current offer

  • Annual subscription :

    $ 35

  • Regular APR:

    17.39% (variable)

  • Recommended credit:

    (No credit history)

  • Learn more external link icon on the secure site of our partner.
  • Introductory bonus:
  • Annual subscription :

    $ 0

  • Regular APR:

    22.99% variable

  • Recommended credit:

    (No credit history)

  • Introductory bonus:

    No current offer

  • Annual subscription :

    $ 0

  • Regular APR:

    26.99% (variable)

  • Recommended credit:

    (No credit history)

  • Learn more external link icon on the secure site of our partner.

Final result

EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

As with all our credit card notice, our analysis is not influenced by any partnership or advertising relationship.

If you are looking to rebuild your credit or have no credit history, you can get started without a credit check with the OpenSky Secured Visa credit card. Regular reports to the credit bureaus can help you establish a positive payment history as long as you pay in full and on time, but you’ll need to pay an annual fee of $ 35 and a minimum security deposit of $ 200 to get started.

But before you apply, consider other secure credit cards that might better meet your credit needs, including no annual fees, no rewards, and easier routes to an unsecured card.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does OpenSky Secure Visa credit card require further investigation?

This credit card does not require applicants to undergo a credit check, which means your Visa OpenSky Secured credit card application does not pose a serious question on your credit report.

Does OpenSky increase your credit limit?

Since the OpenSky Secured Visa credit card ties your credit limit to your security deposit, you can only get a higher credit limit with this card if you put more collateral. However, you can apply for a higher credit limit at any time, as long as you have the cash to increase your deposit.

Is the OpenSky Secure Visa Credit Card a good, secure credit card?

The OpenSky Secured Visa credit card can be useful for people with no credit history, very bad credit scores, or bankruptcy in the recent past. Before you apply, compare this card to other secured credit cards and bad credit cards to make sure it’s right for you.

Nokia deploys private 4G and 5G networks for Indian tribes

According to reports, plans are in place to ensure Native American communities have good networks. According to the latest report, the Finnish manufacturer Nokia. will soon do its part for these areas. The company recently released details of its plan to use private Digital Automation Cloud (DAC) wireless technology to provide 4G and 5G network connectivity. It will provide this network to several Native American communities living in American tribal territories.

The first deployment will cover over 12,000 square miles and provide broadband services to over 15,000 tribal members. Nokia partners with NewCore Wireless. This company is a provider of project management, construction and consultancy services for rural network operators. The company actually focuses on tribal operators.

According to Nokia, it will use the service to provide mobile and broadband internet services in areas where there is no connection. This means that the business will focus on these areas without any network connection. According to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) estimates, 628,000 tribal families in the United States cannot use standard broadband.

In 2020, the US government assigned 400 federally recognized indigenous tribes the spectrum of the Educational Broadband Service (EBS). Some of them can now own and operate their own mobile networks. The EBS spectrum is in the 2.5 GHz frequency band, compatible with most US mobile phones.

Nokia’s private network is being rolled out in Standing Rock Sioux, Cheyenne. It will also be deployed to Arapaho living in parts of North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and California (Arapaho).

Nokia needs these rural areas to increase its income

In 5G, the competition is not as intense as in the smartphone market. However, the big players still have a lot of work to do if they are to be relevant. For 5G equipment, Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia are the main leaders. However, with the US ban crippling Huawei in many markets, Nokia and Ericsson have wiggle room. Nevertheless, Huawei and Ericsson are clearly ahead of Nokia in the area of ​​5G.

Since the beginning of this year, the company is laying off its employees to increase its income. Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark says Nokia will lay off up to 10,000 employees over the next two years. This will allow the company to save capital to invest in the area of ​​5G. We all know what this means, there is currently no job security for Nokia employees. In addition, Lundmark believes that these actions are necessary.

Source link